this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
32 points (90.0% liked)

Technology

59099 readers
3201 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17754665

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but why were the original product lines closed, when there is still a need for them?

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So building new production facilities in another location, with all it takes including logistics, is supposed to be cheaper than continuing an existing production?
It may be so, but something is wrong with this.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was only answering your question. It was shortsighted to close down those production lines. The obvious answer is to rebuild the capacity to make those chips, which will of course be expensive and may not even pay for itself.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Yes, I'm not contradicting you, it's just weird to close production lines that have orders. But maybe the more expensive fabs try to force production to newer processes, because that makes them more money?