Technology

34781 readers

274 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

MinutePhrase@lemmy.ml

271

Girl, 15, speaks out after classmate made deepfake nudes of her and posted online (www.independent.co.uk)

submitted 4 months ago by dvdnet62@feddit.nl to c/technology@lemmy.ml

124 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

There has been yes, but it doesn't mean it's the right ~~ruling~~ law. The law varies on that by jurisdiction as well because it is a murky area.

Edit: in the USA it might not even be illegal unless there was intent to distribute

By the statute's own terms, the law does not make all fictional child pornography illegal, only that found to be obscene or lacking in serious value. The mere possession of said images is not a violation of the law unless it can be proven that they were transmitted through a common carrier, such as the mail or the Internet, transported across state lines, or of an amount that showed intent to distribute.[

So local AI generating fictional material that is not distributed may be okay federally in the USA.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Serious value? How does one legally argue that their AI-generated child porn stash has "serious value" so they they don't get incarcerated.

Laws are weird.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Have the AI try to recreate existing CP already deemed to have serious value and then have all the prompts/variations leading up to the closest match as part of an exhibit.

Edit: I should add, don't try this at home, they'll still probably say it has no value and throw you in jail.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Prison*

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah my bad, you're right.

Then you'll probably get shanked if any of the other inmates find out you were sent there for CP.

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Hey bro, it was just AI-generated tho! And it had serious value!

Plz don't stab me