this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
98 points (97.1% liked)
Asklemmy
43940 readers
379 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Normally, i would assume both theories are jokes
But considering that the comment used "/s" to indicate ths first theory being a joke, but not for the second one, does that mean that a crack in time is more likely than chemtrails?
You know those "The earth isn't flat, its obviously a [Insert Shape Here]" jokes?
This is like that.
Now the joke is ruined.
🥲
You shall perish in the crack in space-time continuum.
Adava Kedavera!