MTG

1835 readers

14 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

andrew@mtgzone.com

mike@mtgzone.com

Mark Rosewater: "We did market research to see if there was an audience for Universe Beyond-less formats. Only 7% of respondents were interested. Too small a group for a format we'd officially create. (markrosewater.tumblr.com)

submitted 1 month ago by mike@mtgzone.com to c/mtg@mtgzone.com

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Is there any possibility that wotc could make universes beyond-free format variants to formats that currently allow them, such as commander and such? My friends and I do not wish to take part in games that ruin our immersion in such a way, when it was the mild role play and "you are a planeswalker" theming that got us into the game, and it's becoming increasingly harder to avoid universes beyond cards. As it stands there isn't a way we can really avoid them at our local gaming stores, and we're getting frustrated only being able to play amongst ourselves in a game that we used to be able to play with others. Can you please give us some hope?

We did some market research to see if there was an audience for Universe Beyond-less formats. Only 7% of respondents were interested. That’s too small a group for a format we’d officially create, but many formats (Commander being the most famous) have begun as things created by the players. Something having a groundswell of support will eventually get noticed.___

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] morphballganon@mtgzone.com 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Isn't that Standard?

[–] NateSwift@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The question was about adding universes beyond-less versions of formats that currently allow for universes beyond cards (such as modern and commander)

[–] Spottso@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This makes sense. Those formats barely fire at any shops near me, splintering them into even more niche formats would be terrible

[–] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Standard does get crossover sets (AFR, MKM, even the IKO Godzilla styles), but I don't think people are really asking for standard without these sets, only the eternal formats.

Edit: while IKO and MKM are technically in-universe and not really Universes Beyond, AFR was Universes Beyond in all but name. The reason it's not classified as such, as far as I can tell, is because WOTC also owns D&D. The set itself was not in-universe and did not feature any characters of MTG.

[–] Evu@mtgzone.com 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I mean, I play Standard for a variety of reasons, but "avoiding Universes Beyond cards" is definitely one of them.

I wonder how different the answer could be if they'd asked the question in a different way.

I'd like Modern better if it didn't have UB cards, but banning UB cards alone wouldn't be enough to get me to start playing Modern. So am I interested in a UB-free Modern? No, but that's not approval of the current state of affairs.