this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
408 points (91.6% liked)

memes

10368 readers
2482 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BonerMan@ani.social -3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The question is why you need a permit in the first place for a animal that lives close to humans anyway, the raccoon thing I was made aware of is another story but would also have been better handled with talking to him.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Because it is a wild animal that can carry rabies.

The way it played out is the squirrel bit someone. The only way to check for rabies and be 100% certain is to cut the brain. Which obviously doesn't lead to the animal being alive anymore. But at the end of the day, a squirrel's life is less important than that of a human, so it had to be done.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Humans can also technically carry rabies.

And also you can begin the immunization for rabies even if you don't know if the animal has it or not, its the same as getting it as a preventative measure, wich should be required for animal control in general anyway.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what that humans can carry rabies? Do you see a difference between a human and a squirrel or not?

[–] BonerMan@ani.social -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Uhhhhh. Actually in this specific case, NO.

[–] Maalus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Then there is no point in talking to you. What they did was 100% justified and that's the end of the discussion.

[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 week ago

Squirrels aren't a typical vector for rabies. There was no indication the squirrel was exposed to a rabies vector, like a bat, any more than a household pet or human.

It bit a NY cop though, that's what happened.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its an adopted wild animal it needs to be registered and vaccinated that makes sense to me. But yeah it's insane how poorly they treated the situation. Idk how they can justify the process.

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah the vaccination part is fine, the registration is questionable but OK and whatever they did was beyond stupid.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I don't think the registration requirement is questionable. If the city needs to check for a gas or water main or sewage leak they're going to want to know if they're going to run into any wild animals. Also, if they're not registered, how will they check with your vet to make sure ongoing/regular vaccinations are given (if/when required).