this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
80 points (98.8% liked)

retrocomputing

4020 readers
1 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Okay for real though... storage size? Terrible I agree.

But I've been kinda obsessed lately with the form factor of diskettes. They're:

  • Not super easy to lose (looking ~~at~~ for you, nanoSD)
  • They're easily labeled.
  • Unlike flash drives, aren't vulnerable to snagging and getting ripped out of the machine or damaging the port when inserted.
  • Easily stacked or filed away.
  • Most importantly: Make a nice satisfying "ka-chunk" when inserting into a drive.
  • Satisfyingly fly out of said drive when you push the eject button firmly.

Nowadays, if we made a diskette that basically replaced the magnetic disc with flash memory, and the shutter protected the connectors, you could hypothetically store like 1TB in that space, it could likely be read super fast, and would obviously be way more reliable than the old "Oh no a speck of dust ruined my 2MB file" of old floppies.

I'd even settle for an open standard akin to Sony's chunky little Memory Sticks...I liked those.