Frugal

5122 readers

1 users here now

Discuss how to save money.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

RarePepeCollector@lemmy.world

What "frugal" tricks have you found to just not be worth it, either in time or money? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by IonAddis@lemmy.world to c/frugal@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've noticed sometimes that there's some half-baked videos or blogs or whatever that purport this or that frugal trick, but if you look at the time or math, it's not actually frugal for you.

What are some examples of that you've come across? The things that "aren't worth it"?

For me it's couponing. (Although I haven't heard people talk about it recently--has it fallen out of "style", or have businesses caught up to the loopholes folks used to exploit?)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's more of a generalized rule but:

Assume that your own time has value.

A lot of "frugal" tips operate off the assumption that you can spend your own time and it doesn't cost anything. But your time is valuable. Time spent trying to save a few bucks should be considered working time; ask yourself how much you would get paid by your job for the same amount of time. Maybe you enjoy doing whatever the thing is, so it can be considered recreation, but if it's some difficult or mind numbing slog, then that doesn't necessarily mean that you actually saved yourself anything, because you weren't getting paid to do work, and you could have been doing something more rewarding instead.

[–] chaples55@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel this way about cooking. I hate cooking. It takes a lot of time. And lots of cleanup time. And time spent planning and shopping. Plus the tools, ingredients, and power/gas/water used all cost money. With all that in mind, a $9 bowl of chipotle is significantly cheaper by my estimation than cooking an equivalent myself.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm with you on cooking something like one meal. If I'm going to get out a bunch of stuff in the kitchen and put in that much effort, then I had better be eating for at least a few days off of what I make. Casseroles, stews, big pots of pasta, and holy hell was I excited when I learned how much curry I could make in one big crock pot and then put that on rice for like two weeks' worth of meals.

[–] Teodomo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just cook stuff that basically cooks itself. Crockpots, pasta, certain veggies and meats on the oven. After doing them many times I already know the timings for everything so I just put alarms to remind me of turning the fire off/flipping them in the oven once and that's it. Doing something else in between. Technically speaking you spend only a couple minutes actively cooking for each meal that way. Just don't forget to set the alarms or it's burnt (and move the particular meat from the freezer to the fridge the night before)

[–] Daqu@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

I would not habe worked in that time. I would have sat on the sofa and watched something on Netflix that I do not care about.