this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
55 points (92.3% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

169 readers
648 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

What might be a catchy hit to inspire the hearts and reinforce the identity of its majority following?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rezz@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

First recognize the most important reason you’re losing, and I hate to be cliche about it, but it’s the Glengarry Glen Ross rule: coffee is for closers only. These are the Glengarry leads and they’re not for you losers.

The Dems simply suck at selling. They suck at critically self examining their own strategy and get high on their own supply—while hardcore Christians within the GOP are meticulously planning for years their long term plays for generational change in their favor. The Supreme Court is the ultimate example of this.

This has nothing to do with policy, being too right or left, etc. You simply (a) suck at selling, (b) are not clearly selling something simple.

Dems can’t sell well to their own customers on the left.

After you address the mechanics of this—the messenger, the message, the product, the ROI, the user and experience—then you can be concerned with policy.

The Dems mistaken think policy is what is selling. It is not. Trump is not selling policy or issues at the end of the day. He’s selling a vision of how to solve the biggest problems.

Sure he’s a pig rapist. The fact that you can’t outsell a pig rapist 78 year old should tell you just how bad you are at selling.

It is simply not about the issues.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 4 points 22 hours ago

Trump doesn't need to sell a vision of anything... He has almost no thoughts of his own except loving being worshipped... Maga TELLS HIM what he's going to support, and then he fucking supports it (so they'll worship him)... Dems should try this whole "support what the people who might vote for you tell you to support" thing

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There’s also a lot of cheating, backstabbing, lying, and gross misuse of funds required.

It’s not a thing to be “like” them. We can’t because what they are is stupid, evil, fascist, and wrong. They love power and money and will do literally anything up to and including destroying the actual planet everything lives on to get it.

There’s no “left wing” version of that.

[–] D1G17AL@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's called doing the wrong things for the right reasons. Having the capacity to do negative things with the expected outcome being a net-positive should be seen as something worthwhile. Instead Democrats want to be pussies.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Granted, the Democratic party in this election was a classic case of "Those who don't standfor anything will fall for anything." I don't agree with your assessment of what it takes to win, but agree that the Dem party leaders are pushovers when it comes to playing hardball against the opposition.

You should find a new slur though. Pussies are anything but weak.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world -1 points 14 hours ago

Your last sentence is why we lost. No one thinks pussies are strong and if you have to explain you already lost. Get a clue.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

There’s no “left wing” version of that.

Well ...

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

trump doesn't sell 'policy' or 'vision' or even the 'concept' of either.

he sells fear and hate.

and ~ 30-40% of the population is feasting on all he can dish up.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 5 points 21 hours ago

Fear and hate (of Trump) was all the Dems were selling too... They literally ran (again) on a platform of "at least we're not him" and that's about it... But the Dems will never outsell Republicans on fear and hate, and they shouldn't even try because the people who might vote for them aren't looking for fear and hate

[–] rezz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is the tunnel vision that causes Dems to lose. This is simply a useless analysis if your goal is to crush the election and win.

You can be defeatist or get practical. We know Trump is beyond bad. He’s outselling. How do we win?

[–] D1G17AL@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

By selling his option as worse. Advertise how it would affect them. Tell them how much his policies cost. Sell it.

[–] Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This is basically the only thing they tried... You're saying they should have just tried harder at what they were already doing... In reality they needed an entirely different approach

[–] D1G17AL@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Well, the better approach would be to stop courting so-called "corporate" democrats and actually make a true Progressive People's Party. No one will do it cause no one understands that in order to succeed this People's Party would have to be a simultaneously centralized and yet de-centralized party. No one person can lay claim to leadership in this party. Too much centralized power and you have corruption.

Essentially we need to bring back or attempt to resurrect the Workers & Poor People's Party. The best way forward is riding on true progressive policies that at their core counter-act the effects of things like Project 2025.

No one will do it though. Current so called "leftists" are too afraid to get their hands dirty or to fight fire with fire when it comes to actually arguing or debating the idiotic cretins that helped put Trump and his cronies into power. If every single working class voter banded together and actually supported each other. Then we could get REAL people elected and not just another dipshit with some random law school MBA as their only life experience or education.

Real people with real experiences need to lead us.

Anyone else is just going to take advantage in some way.