this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
1152 points (91.2% liked)

Political Memes

5490 readers
1961 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My guy I'm saying it's the goal in general not this election. It is the existential goal of anyone left of maga.

You should review the electoral college maps compared to population, in addition to gerrymandering. Democrats actively seek to improve voter access, proper districting and so on. If those topics are continued and eventually successful, the republican party is exposed for the minority population that is is. Republicans cannot win in a "fair" fight.

Lastly my point regarding judicial appointments is critical here: redistricting and voter access issues are won in the courtroom. Reducing conservative appointments is absolutely possible with a Harris win.

Delusional is thinking all this happens in one term, while ignoring the backslide of progress a trump term would mean.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

it’s the goal in general not this election.

One Party Rule is the goal of both parties, and equally unattainable for similar reasons.

Democrats actively seek to improve voter access, proper districting and so on

They do not, as evidenced by the failure to advance DC Statehood when they had a majority.

my point regarding judicial appointments is critical here

Republicans will control the Senate at the end of this election. Harris will not shift the balance of power under these conditions.

thinking all this happens in one term

Do you think this is the first term Dems and GOPers have been struggling for power?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I do not. Why would I?

Trump has made judicial appointments a key goal of his first term, so it stands to reason he'd do the same now. Avoiding that is progress, even if Harris gets zero.

Edit: to avoid playing nickel and dime debate club:

The democratic party is wildly imperfect and often ineffectual. I'm not satisfied, and I'm not cheerleading for them.

Harris may also be wildly imperfect and often ineffectual. That's still better than the massive equality, stability and integrity sink trump represents and that's what I'm arguing for.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump has made judicial appointments a key goal of his first term

McConnell made it a key goal. That's why he blocked Garland for 10 months under Obama.

Schumer has not. That's why he let a SCOTUS nomination fall into Trump's hands a mere 10 weeks before Biden took office.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago

Please note I had a late edit that should head off this back and forth on specifics.