this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
384 points (99.2% liked)

Linux

5174 readers
208 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev
384
Linux Mint and Framework Laptops Join Forces (linuxiac.com)
submitted 2 days ago by lemmee_in@lemm.ee to c/linux@programming.dev
55 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mad_Punda 3 points 10 hours ago

Same.
I think I would need comparable energy efficiency as well though. For portable machines it’s hard to go for an x86_64 one when I can get so much more battery life out of an arm one.
Getting official support for a distribution should help with a good out of the box battery life at least. But I think they’d need arm or riscv before it really becomes comparable?