Which is not a really good criticism in my opnion. It still had a lot of the core elements of AC, they just tried some new things. And a lot of it worked out.

[–] guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Agreed. As a game it was one of the best Ubi has done maybe ever imo.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I enjoyed Origins, Odyssey just felt so... empty. I couldn't bring myself to do the post-game content I was so bored with it. I got to the Medusa and just... stopped. Have no desire to go back to it.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I enjoyed Origins as well. To me Odyssey was a more refined version of Origins. Better exploration, combat, etc. Odyssey focused more on exploration which is maybe why you felt it was more empty? I enjoyed it personally but it's definitely a preference thing.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There was definitely more exploration but all the "dungeons" were just cookie cutter copy/paste sections from what I remember, Origins at least had some unique puzzles

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

True, now you're making me want to replay Origins lol.