this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
887 points (98.8% liked)

Political Weirdos

765 readers
3 users here now

A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
887
Did this MAGA weirdo just say he'd turn these GenZers into his sexual plaything? (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 month ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/political_weirdos@lemmy.world
108 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shellbeach@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Or doesn't know the meaning of concubines. Begging the question what _did_he mean?

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I eat pieces of shit like you for breakfast"

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I’m guessing he thought it was a fancy term for slaves. Which is wrong in a lot of ways, but also just weird..

It’s the best read of it I can manage though..

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Nah bro. He’s just copped to tryna fuck kids. Just republican shit.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

I bet he was being polite and he actually wanted to write "you would be my bitches". Not polite, MAGA polite.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Or doesn’t know the meaning of concubines.

I don't know the meaning of that word either, but based on context I assume it's because I'm not into any sketchy shit.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's the step between mistress and partner.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh.......yeah, I was thinking it was much darker. It sounds like some kind of metalic tub that you put children in to rape them in the fields of Alaska at an oil rig job.

At least with mistress's and partners consent is a key factor.

[–] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In several countries, and absolutely historically, it’s actually been a government-classified relationship status.

It just means people involved in a romantic and sexual relationship who are unwilling or unable to legally marry for whatever reason (because they are already married, because they aren’t legally qualified, such as one member is from a slave caste, etc)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concubinage

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's an old term for a pleasure slave.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, concubinage was typically consensual.

[–] BalooWasWahoo@links.hackliberty.org 9 points 1 month ago

By definition of concubine, sure, but consensual is a far cry for most. I'm trying to remember the exact quote, but I'll paraphrase it here: 'In slave-owning societies, the vast majority of concubines were slaves.' https://archive.org/details/historicaldictio0000klei for the source.