this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
72 points (93.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43958 readers
864 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I refuse to watch cable news, don’t have regular tv, and not a fan of visual media for news anyways. I would love something like a Lemmy/reddit mega thread where I can refresh and get up to the minute updates, but from professional news/journalists. But without the faux drama reality tv stuff that the cable news networks always do. I also love podcasts so if there’s a listening medium that isn’t overly dramatic that works too. Any suggestions?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

all of our media is controlled by capitalists so i plan on going with organizations that have had a reliable history within the last decade or so; like democracynow or npr.

[–] can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io 4 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Is it bad that I get most of my non-local news from foreign sources? I do look at the AP and NPR but I usually go to the BBC or Reuters first and I almost always check the CSM for international stories I want more information on.

[–] Taalnazi@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Reuters, BBC are fine, AP as well. Al Jazeera is good too. Always be aware of the media biases, nevertheless. Look how they frame and write.

Do they say:

[ethnic thing] arrested and stopped by Police...
or do they say:
Police murders person...

and;
Trump victim of woke witchhunt / Harris loyal to Israel
or:
"The elections have started."

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

i don't think that they're much different, if at all.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The BBC and Reuters have both gone way, way downhill in recent years, but the concept is reasonably valid. AP and NPR are still good. Aljazeera is actually pretty decent for US news, though I'm not sure if that's true for US news related to the middle east.

[–] would_be_appreciated@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I think Al Jazeera is good for news related to the middle east - Al Jazeera has an Arab bias, the same way US news has a US/Israel bias. When there's a conflict between US/Israel and the Arabs, I tend to be more sympathetic to the Arabs, so I prefer their news. Somebody with politics different from mine would disagree.

Plus they sometimes put out absolute fire like this: https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2024/9/11/debate-in-nuclear-armed-former-colony-fails-to-reassure-global-community

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

NPR is state media, and who runs the state? The capitalist class.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

very true and if it weren't for the tireless efforts of their journalists i would have classified it as the same category as the others.

i think that the best you can do under the overwhelming circumstances in my country is to try and i think that they are trying despite their own biases manifesting themselves from time to time and their perpetual funding dance with partners like the imperial gov't and the american oligarchs.