this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
622 points (96.0% liked)

memes

10668 readers
2125 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is news to me, thank you

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Welcome! If you want to read about it here you can, they supposedly backpedaled and "it's not that bad" but there is zero trust in those private owners.

[–] windpunch 8 points 1 month ago

I remember reading some articles saying that they backtracked.

I can't judge how careful the people saying "Audacity is evil" are regarding privacy. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just interested in your thoughts.

MuseScore is owned by the same company, Firefox is worse (as the article mentions)... Do you not use either of these? Do you use one of these but not Audacity? If the second one applies to someone, what would be the reason? As a matter of principle? Something else?

(I mean, I don't know of a FOSS alternative to MuseScore.)