SneerClub

989 readers

2 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

self@awful.systems

blakestacey@awful.systems

dgerard@awful.systems

JD Vance outs himself as an SSCer, SSCers react (www.reddit.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by Evinceo@awful.systems to c/sneerclub@awful.systems

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I haven't read the whole thread yet, but so far the choice line is:

I like how you just dropped the “Vance is interested in right authoritarianism” like it’s a known fact to base your entire point on. Vance is the clearest demonstration of a libertarian the republicans have in high office. It’s an absurd ad hominem that you try to mask in your wall of text.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] self@awful.systems 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

holy fuck how are you like this

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"is it me, driveby poster, that is wrong? no, it must be everyone else who knows the sub that's wrong"

[–] self@awful.systems 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

like the thing I can’t figure out is, what in the fuck did they think we were quoting and reacting to?

actually nah I can figure it out, they saw a link to reddit and decided they had a cake to shit on

and as everyone knows, you can’t cut off a cake shit mid-log

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 2 weeks ago

what I appreciate (inasfar as something to laugh at) is that when this is pointed out they double down like it's their life savings riding on the game