Programmer Humor

32561 readers

349 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
No NSFW content.
Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

cat_programmer@lemmy.ml

861

More confusion for recruiters (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 4 months ago by alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

86 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Honestly if someone irons out the edge cases, python probably could JIT compile to machine code via cython. It would take a fair bit of memory and probably a bit slow on low powered systems but it would be so much faster if cached.

[–] Zangoose@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Technically I think python already has an intermediate step that it uses before it starts running a script that compiles it into a lower-ish language (at least the cpython interpreter does this, it probably isn't a part of the language specification though)

The actual line between JIT languages and interpreted languages is pretty thin since I think most interpreted languages do something similar to minimize the amount that needs to be done at runtime

[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I think at this point in time it JIT compiles into byte code and cached which is more efficiently interpreted the next time that function is called.