this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
1221 points (99.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26877 readers
2553 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I don't get it after the 2nd had, any chance someone else understands?

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

It needs a comma.

All the good faith I had had, had had no effect.

Essentially "all the food faith I previously had, didn't have any effect".

Good God English is an awful language.

[–] Classy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure it is grammatically correct with no comma. The version you provided is a comma splice.

To slightly change the tense, All the good faith that I had had no effect is grammatically correct with no comma, so the gerund form should also not need a comma.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Perhaps. Regardless it's outlandish abuse of the tongue IMO and definitely would benefit from the comma because nobody's going to just bang out 4 had's in a row in speech without a pause without a justifiable slap across the chops and possibly a challenge to a duel.

"But your honour, he said 'had' four times on the trot without pause"

"Case dismissed"

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

You're welcome. :) Took me a minute tbh. Not sure if the wine I've had helped or hindered. It's 2:30am here.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

no it's not. you can find quirks like this in every language.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

True enough but I feel like English has more quirks than other languages though I acknowledge that may be bias.

I used to have near fluent Irish way back when and I don't recall any shenanigans like this (again I acknowledge I may not have been presented with them). I feel like most other languages have a more clearly defined set of pronunciation rules too.

Irish looks horrific (Siobhán is shiv-awn for example) but very very closely follows pronunciation rules so that pronunciation would be no surprise to a native reading it for the first time. English sure as fuck does not follow rules like that.

Near. Neat. Book. Boot. Etc.

(Some small subset of Irish folks do say "boo-k" though)

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

maybe I should have clarified: not every language has quirks in the same ways. German has weird articles that make no sense. ~~French has different pluralization rules for up to four objects.~~ e: this is probably wrong but there are many languages with different pluralizations for two objects (a dual) and for any number more than two. there are remnants of this in English as well, in words like both, either and neither.

But even of you just want to think about writing: German makes super long words that look monstrous by mushing words together. French doesn't pronounce half the letters in its spelling. Arabic doesn't really have vowels but instead uses diacritics that are often omitted so you have to be really familiar with the language to read at all.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

French has different pluralization rules for up to four objects

What?

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

well I can't find a source for it now. maybe I'm misremembering. I read it in the book The Universal History of Numbers by Georges Ifrah. maybe it was referring to some remnant exception, maybe it was about another language. can't verify it cause the book is not nearby right now. maybe I confused it with four different ways to pluralize in French (s, x, aux, none) idk.

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, you mean word endings for plurals, well those depend on the gender and the singular word ending. They can be a bit confusing, because they're not always regular like local -> locaux, but naval -> navals. You have that in other languages too, even in english, like goose -> geese, but moose -> moose, mouse -> mice, house -> houses, and so on.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

yeah that's my point. language isn't math, it changes over time organically and therefore is bound to have quirks. some of it is even inorganic, like when English linguists wanted to spell words of Latin origin in a way that reflects it.

[–] abbadon420@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn't need a comma, it needs restructuring. When phrasing it like this, it is customary to add a comma between two adjacent verbs. You could even argue that the first part is an introductory phrase, which would explain the comma too.

[–] chicagohuman@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Why was your food faith no good?

[–] iSeth@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

"...did have, did have..."