this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
78 points (100.0% liked)

Transgender

156 readers
229 users here now

The Lemmy place to discuss the news and experiences of transgender people.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussions civil.

  2. Arguments against transgender rights will be removed.

  3. No bigotry is allowed - including transphobia, homophobia, speciesism, racism, sexism, classism, ableism, castism, or xenophobia.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Let's see what happens to states (and also countries like Russia) which purposefully enact policies that cause educated people to leave.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

They lose money and the states that do make money (blue states) pick up the bill. I really don't know why this point isn't driven home more. Texas is the only red state that pays more tax to the federal government than they receive in aid(and frankly theyre more purple but oppressed). The states most reliant on federal funding in order to function are the reddest states.

[–] Curiousfur@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

~~As long as the state stays red, they'll always have equal say in how our government works. That's the plan, it's a slow hostile takeover because representation doesn't correlate to population. It's how Wyoming has the same voting power as California, even though California's GDP is measured on a global scale more accurately than a national scale. The more educated people leave to blue states, the more say red states have in national politics.~~

Replied further up the chain