this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
243 points (91.2% liked)

Atheist Memes

5586 readers
32 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I've seen anecdotal stories of geologists who claimed they were creationists. The brain is an amazing thing.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't it the other way around? Creationists claiming to be geologists?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I suppose, but the point is they do a job that requires them be knowledgeable of the science, and yet can compartmentalize things to do that but also have beliefs that run very much against what they observe in reality. Hell, geology was a science born from creationists trying to find evidence of the Flood, who then chose to go the path that the data took them, not the Bible.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

geology was a science born from creationists trying to find evidence of the Flood

Is this a real thing (outside of the US)?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems that the en article has a bit of an agenda in that regard. You might want to check other versions.

Maybe reality is a bit more nuanced.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 4 weeks ago

An agenda? Interesting. I'd love to hear what agenda you see when it's simply discussing how Christians over a few centuries starting looking for the remnants of the Flood to prove the Bible but found the opposite, and some followed reality, while others dug deeper into their book and ignored what they had found.