this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
751 points (97.0% liked)

Science Memes

11161 readers
2456 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Could someone please explain?

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Let's say the summer average is 30⁰C or 303.15 Kelvin

The absolute coldest possible temperature is -273.15⁰C, or 0K.

Halfway between absolute zero and 30⁰C/303.15K is somewhere around -121⁰C/152K

So if it were half as hot in the summer, it would be colder than ever recorded on earth.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In short, you don't want to use a temperature scale with an arbitrary starting point for doing calculations like this. The freezing point of water is no more or less arbitrary than the freezing point of oxygen or sodium or anything else. It's just one that's somewhat useful for everyday use. When handling calculations for multiplying temperature, you want an absolute scale like Kelvin.

Or Rankine if you're that kind of pervert.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What makes Kelvin absolute, and why is Celsius "wobbly"?

I failed physics in high school

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

0 K is like when there is 0 heat basically, while celsius isn't. Imagine a unit for distance called "goob" where 0 goobs is 100 m and 1 goob is 115 m. In that case the goob unit would behave differently than a meter when you multiply and divide because 0 of the units don't actually correspond to "nothing" in a physical sense. That's exactly how the Celsius scale is, with zero being placed somewhere arbitrarily, not at a physical zero.

[–] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

i feel like i need more goob in my life. do you sell rulers?

[–] Bumblefumble@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Bit of an awkward scale for a ruler, but I can sell you one from -6.6666666.... to -6.65 goobs.

[–] yetiftw@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

absolute scales are still arbitrary. you would probably want to use a scale that measures "perceived heat" which is different than average kinetic energy

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Kelvin is just our word for it, but that is the point of “no heat”. It isn’t arbitrary, there is no “negative kelvin” just like you cannot make something colder than absolute zero.

So if you take the difference between “coldest possible temp” and “average summer temp”, then slice it in half, you’re getting temperatures that would kill most life on earth.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

Just to nitpick, there are negative kelvins. I don't really understand it, myself, but I know it exists due to the specifics of how temperature is defined. Negative kelvins are actually extremely hot.

[–] yetiftw@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

just because it has a reason doesn't make it not arbitrary. you can ultimately come up with a reason for all arbitrary decisions

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is there a way to distinguish between arbitrary and non-arbitrary? Or is literally everything ever arbitrary?

[–] yetiftw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

literally every definition ever is arbitrary

[–] frezik@midwest.social 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then what's the point of even calling it arbitrary? If it covers everything, then there's no reason for the word.

[–] yetiftw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

that's not true. there are things that are not definitions. like my bed for instance, there are aspects that are arbitrary (my personal preferences, design choices, etc) and aspects that are not arbitrary (its physical form that exists beyond definition)

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Do you not understand what the word arbitrary means?…

[–] yetiftw@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

maybe you're the one who doesn't understand the ramifications of its meaning