this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
137 points (98.6% liked)

UK Politics

3103 readers
211 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's time to see if the polls are right.

Previously: the voting megathread

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And the depressing thing is that it will never change because the only parties with the power to change it benefit from the current system.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You came so close in 2011. I wonder what could have happened if Clegg had stuck to his guns and insisted on a referendum on a proportional system, to remove the "progressive no" (to borrow a term from a recent Australian constitutional referendum) argument against the reform.

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Lib Dems got so excited about being granted a referendum that they forgot to take it seriously.

AV was a terrible system and arguably worse than FPTP. It's a more complicated system for people to vote in, and would potentially lead to even more disproportionate results.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 8 points 4 months ago

and arguably worse than FPTP

Sorry but no. Absolutely no. The only downside is the ability to use it as an excuse not to upgrade to a proportional system in the future.

More complicated? Yeah, I guess. But not enough to actually matter. Not unless you think British people are just exceptionally stupid compared to Australians.

More disproportionate results? Impossible. They're both single-winner systems. The key difference is that FPTP allows a plurality to win while IRV requires a majority. It might create a situation where it seems less proportionate, but that's only because you reduce strategic voting so people are voting their true beliefs, so candidates that weren't going to win under either system end up getting more votes under IRV. But the ultimate result is that the candidate who wins in each electorate is the one who had the most support.