this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
355 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59554 readers
3295 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
355
WD unveils new high-capacity 32TB SMR and 26TB CMR disk drives (www.techspot.com)
submitted 1 month ago by AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
76 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

A better way to word it is: SMR is only suited for archival usage. Large writes, little-to-no random writes.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how the read performance would be.

[–] Eximius@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you know the format of SMR, then you can trivially see the read performance is not impacted. Writing is impacted, because it has to write multiple times for each sector write (because of overlapping sectors that allow the extra density).

Impacted write performance, coupled with hdds are generally slow with random writes PLUS the extra potential for data loss due to less-atomic sector writes, makes them terrible drives for everything except archival usage.