this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
100 points (89.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43336 readers
780 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As a fellow Gen Zer I feel like there is a generational gap. I want to see if I'm trippin or there actually is one.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Secondly, a millennium is a thousand years. Are you saying the previous thousand years (1000-1999) don't count as a millennium that millennials... existed in?

I agree with that the comment you're replying to is basically nonsense, but I do have two points to correct about this.

First, a small nitpick. Technically, millennia go from 01โ€“00, so 1001โ€“2000, with 2001 being the first year of the new millennium.

More significantly, it is obviously the case that millennials were so named because of something to do with the turn of the millennium. Frankly I don't know what that is and it would have made more sense to name gen Z millennials because they actually span across the millenium divide and are the first generation born into the new millennium. Or if gen Y had started and finished 5 years later, they could have spanned the bridge, as well as even older genYers still being children during it, which would have been more appropriate.

[โ€“] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

First, a small nitpick. Technically, millennia go from 01โ€“00, so 1901โ€“2000, with 2001 being the first year of the new millennium.

Bro, a hundred years is a century. That's why 1900 was "turn of the century."

A millennium is one thousand years.

[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ah shit sorry. I'll edit that.

Still, it's 1001 to 2001.

Yes, and with that edit, I do agree with your point.

[โ€“] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Think you mean 1001 to 2000 ๐Ÿ˜‰

[โ€“] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 2 months ago

๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ

Yes. Yes I do.