this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
95 points (88.6% liked)

Space

8671 readers
62 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

There was a lot of extra fire at the end, but it looked amazing.

It's going both way slower than expected, but progress is also super rapid. This is exactly what they needed to get going with the Artemis moon landing. Without this catch they'd never be able to refuel cost effectively.

[โ€“] burble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It looks like some small pieces blew off the booster and there was a little fire at the end, but they recovered it and can work on solving that for the next flight. What a catch.

[โ€“] Fermion@feddit.nl 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I wonder how much they'll be able to learn through thoroughly inspecting the flown hardware. That's not a luxury they've had up until now. I would imagine it's way easier to figure out exactly how minor issues manifested when they can go through the booster with a fine toothed comb.

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Elon said they've done an initial inspection and it's looking great. Also already found some stuff to improve that they'd never know without the catch

A few outer engine nozzles are warped from heating & some other minor issues, but these are easily addressed.

[โ€“] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm eager to see how they'll address the nozzle warping. I wonder if they would do a short reentry burn after all, or whether changes to the flight profile or engine shielding would be sufficient.

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

With the changes in raptor 3 getting rid of the heat shields I'm wondering what this means as well. It warped with a heat shield. Prior to this, they didn't think raptor 3 needed one, but does this change things?

[โ€“] synapse1278@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

They won't have this chance with the starship, although they tried. The splash-down seamed relatively smooth, but the starship exploded soon after.

load more comments (5 replies)