TechTakes

1438 readers

46 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

dgerard@awful.systems

536

Well, AI made our search unusable dogshit. But AI also made us miss our climate goals, so (apnews.com)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems

112 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

presenting a DM from someone who absolutely doesn’t have internalized transphobia, never heard of it:

So I’m gonna reach out and say that you hastily misunderstood “and that shit about trans people”. I’m talking about the hate speech from the right wing. Keep me banned though that community is full of people who really have a low level reading ability.

when a libertarian-presenting shithead with not particularly deep political takes posts “it’s a distraction just like the bullshit about trans people” with no other qualifiers, it’s absolutely understood as a dogwhistle for “people need to shut up about trans issues”

and if I’m wrong about that? using trans folks to make your bullshit points is still fucking transphobia. don’t do this shit. it’s fucking concerning you can’t understand that.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

“keep me banned though”

the fuck? they thought a pestering third-avenue dm would have resulted in a different action?

“that community is full of people who really have a low level reading ability”

absolutely fucking perfect, 300/10, no notes

what the utter belligerent fuck

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I can’t tell whether their intended point with that last one was “I said all the dogwhistles and none of you agreed instantly!”, or a genuine intent at stating that there was a perceived shallowness in our communal reading comprehension

and either case just makes no goddamn sense whatsoever, what the fuck