this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Europe

8488 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The burning of qurans is clearly meant to incite hate and violence though, and frankly people shouldn't be burning anything in public anyways.

They're still perfectly free to invite anyone to their backyard book burnings, don't act like this is some authoritarian limit on freedom, this is an active intervention to PRESERVE freedom from the nazis who want to take it from us.

[–] frostbiker@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I do not approve of burning holy books, but I think it should be legal.

What people shouldn't do and what should be banned are different things. I don't want to live in a place where what is not mandatory is banned. There has to be some room for freedom of expression, even for people expressing ideas we dislike.

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There has to be some room for freedom of expression, even for people expressing ideas we dislike.

And there still is plenty of room of public expression of opinions without burning a book representing a religious group. Seriously there are thousands of ways to do so.

But European countries did learn some lessons and that's why some actions such as calling for religious or other minority groups to be killed or to intimindate such groups with displays of violence isn't allowed in many of them. And burning a religious book in public is such an act of intimidation which serves absolutely no constructive purpose. That's why many European countries don't allow such behaviour.

[–] taladar@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

that’s why some actions such as calling for religious or other minority groups to be killed or to intimindate such groups with displays of violence isn’t allowed in many of them

Then why are you giving groups who threaten violence an incentive to do that more often by giving in to their demands?

[–] brainrein@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, rightwing people have proved over and over again that they’re willing to not only burn books but to burn people.

[–] taladar@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

So we should make action A by right-wing people illegal because they are known to do action B?

[–] Syndic@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago

So we now should base our laws only on doing the opposite of what a few lunatics demand regardless on how it will affect a lot more people? I really don't think so.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I do not approve of burning books, full stop. I couldn’t care less whose imaginary friend the book is or isn’t about.

But I completely agree that the government should categorically not be legislating which books you can and cannot burn. Burning a book is a form of free speech. It’s often offensive to many people, but it’s still important - if for no other reason than it lets the people doing the burning show their true colors.

[–] Sigmatics@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Exactly. People can burn anything they want in their backyard. Just keep out of public spaces

That’s absolutely not what I am saying.