this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
151 points (98.1% liked)

World News

37466 readers
2415 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 18 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Well, they have been under US sanctions for a long time now. That's what started the Pacific side of WWII.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (7 children)

The effects of the Communist revolution and the US response to it were so powerful that they went back in time by 20 years to start WW2?

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I've read this like five times and I have no idea what the heck you're trying to get at.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The user he responded to said the sanctions affected WW2 when the sanction happened much later.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Sanctions on Japan. That was extremely obvious in context. I thought they had a point beyond being unable to read.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)