this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
1158 points (97.9% liked)

People Twitter

5277 readers
498 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And on the other side of the spectrum my friend was at -10, got it done and has been complaining for the past 15 years or more. He can barely drive at night now and it hasn't fixed all his issues so he still needs glasses and has needed them since the operation (just not as much for his myopia) so he's not saving any money

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago

I’m not doubting at all that there are cases like this and I’m terribly sorry for your friend. I only wanted to present a different perspective for those considering having the procedure. It’s definitely not a decision that should be made lightly.

[–] aniki@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

mate at -10 he wasn't doing great before he had lasik either.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was 100% functional with glasses now not functional at night with or without glasses, dry eyes, still needs glasses

[–] aniki@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

No one is saying that it's a flawless procedure but at -10 homie is a few stops away from legally blind. He gambled and lost. Life's a beach.