this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
551 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

59599 readers
3381 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't, which informs the rise technical mitigations of YouTube's terrible ad schemes. YouTube isn't interested in a more egalitarian society but serving its shareholder masters, and it sucks even at that.

YouTube subscriptions are not a good deal for the consumers, so they're not going to be popular, which might serve to explain to you why everyone is not a paying subscriber, nor will they ever be.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

All you have to do is look at other streaming services which are subscriber-only to see the truth of what I said. Even the ones that have ads are not doing backflips to cram them everywhere as the other commenter complained, because ads are just supplementary revenue, not primary. The subscription model is incredibly strong historically and currently. It’s patently ridiculous that you think you can wave it away so easily. You’ll also notice that most other subscriptions are cheaper than YT Premium - because they’re going for subscriber scale where YT has a powerful ad business in place that subscriptions replace.

If you’re not following me, I’ll simplify: if everyone on YT has to subscribe, as on Netflix, it in fact would cost a lot less. But you don’t, so you get ads up the wazoo.

I’m even more baffled by your criticism that YT cares more about shareholders than creating an egalitarian society. Thats true of literally every business including the one you work for. YT never said they were trying to make society egalitarian. Where do you even get that shit from?

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I’m even more baffled by your criticism that YT cares more about shareholders than creating an egalitarian society. Thats true of literally every business including the one you work for. YT never said they were trying to make society egalitarian. Where do you even get that shit from?

The pissed-off engineers that develop effective adblockers, for which there remains robust support.

Much like the west coast oyster monopolies of the 1880s that were scourged by oyster pirates, YouTube is fighting a losing battle.

PS: I take you're aware of the cord-cutting epidemic of cable television, yes?

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Piracy, cable TV, cord cutting.

You’re throwing a lot of words together without making any argument.

YT is winning the battle against blockers as evidenced by the extreme vitriol toward them here right now.

YT are winning at business: they are massively successful.

YT are winning competitively. Just listen to the cries of monopoly around here. That’s how strong YT are.

YT won my business by making something I use every day and mostly can’t find a substitute for.

What are they losing again? They’re not even losing the ad blocker users, who clearly and obviously depend greatly on YT or they wouldn’t be so mad that their free ride is over.

Explain to me again how someone who writes an ad blocker gives you the idea that YT is supposed to be creating an egalitarian world? That part made no sense.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, I'm good.

I think an athiest would have a better chance trying to deconvert a Catholic Bishop than I'd have getting you up to speed.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You can’t make your point. And I’m not impressed by this attempt to make it look like you’re just choosing not to because SWISH SWISH you’re just too cool for that.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well, I certainly can't make my point to you. You have bested my patience, my fellow lemming.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

SWISH SWISH you have bested my patience! SWISH SWISH lol ok bye dude

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Wow. Is this normal behavior for you?