Firefox

17899 readers

41 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

Why Did Mozilla Remove XUL Add-ons? (yoric.github.io)

submitted 1 month ago by kirk781@discuss.tchncs.de to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

An old article but provides a detailed view on the choice of removing the old XUL addons

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

TIL.

Thanks for sharing!

Edit: added quote below

By design, WebExtensions is more limited than the promiscuous extension mechanism. By design, it also works better. Most of the Firefox development tax has disappeared, as only the WebExtensions API needs to be protected, rather than the entire code of Firefox. Most of the maintenance tax has disappeared, as the WebExtensions API are stable (there have unfortunately been a few exceptions). It is also much simpler to use, lets add-on developers share code between Firefox and Chromium add-ons and should eventually make it easier to write extensions that work flawlessly on Desktop and Mobile.

[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago

With uBlock Origin and many other extensions working (almost) flawlessly on mobile, I'd say they were spot on. Almost, because some aren't comfortable to use because they aren't made with touch and small a screen in mind.