this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
34 points (92.5% liked)

Games

16813 readers
478 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A net negative $400 million? Yes?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I don't understand why they abandoned it so quickly instead of at least trying a f2p model. Shut down servers for a week and announce a relaunch?

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Corpos love to parrot sunk cost fallacy. As a developer myself I have seen very promising projects thrown away at 95% completion because some finance guy realized how much they had spent on it. No amount of "we're only weeks away from launch" or "look at the potential here" will work with these people. It's maddening how detached from reality they are, they get it in their head that another penny will mean that they're just burning money, when all I see is how much was already spent.

So yeah, with 400mil put in already? You don't even want to see if any of it is salvageable? The maps? The worlds? F2P? Selling it to an indie dev to retool? Nope, to corpo you might as well throw it in the garbage, anything else is "Sunk cost"

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

Hell, they were already selling copies too. They were at 100% "completion" and still threw it out

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We don't know that it's "abandoned" just yet. It has in essence been recalled. They may very well try pivoting it to a free to play model, but something like that can take longer than a week.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

They could not have paid enough people to download the game and play it, let alone get people to do it for free.