this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
40 points (97.6% liked)

Emulation

3433 readers
1 users here now

Community to talk about emulation & roms.

RULES:

1.) No bigotry

LINKS:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Luci@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (24 children)

This is FUD

The libretro/retroarch devs are the problem and why the license was changed.

Open source != owned by everyone

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 2 points 3 days ago (23 children)

Exactly my thoughts. The project is going to remain open source, but not free. I hate when people fail to recognize the difference between free software and open source software.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

open source but not free

You mean source available then. Do not conflate these terms, please.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh my god, stop being a proscriptivist about this. Open source is not the same as free software. You're thinking of FLOSS.

Previous discussion.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Didn't realize you were the same user, I would've used different words so it didn't feel like I was trying to reopen an argument or something. My mistake, friend. ❤️ I mean that genuinely. I hope you don't view me as some thread hopping flame lord about this topic.

Edit: Wait, I wasn't replying to you lol. My point still applies though.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

heh, it's alright. in this case I suppose I come off as the thread-hopper :P

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)