this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
69 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

2520 readers
8 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tofu Rabbit vindicated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, the nerf gun is sold by Bungie in collaboration with Hasbro. Whoever did the art for the nerf gun, whether in house or contracted, looked online and just stole the artists', Tofu's, work. Bungie are compensating them for it, so its a non issue now, but its just another case of art being stolen for official products.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But the question being asked is about the fact that Tofu's work is clearly an unauthorized derivative work of Destiny's original gun.

The post I was responding to assumed that he had done commissioned work for Bungie, not that he used their art to make a version for a fan.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 2 months ago

Oh right yeah, extra confusing in the way I worded that too.

A guy called Josh commissioned the original art, I don't know if he was a Bungie employee or not. I was just interested in peoples view of this dynamic. An artist takes money to draw/copy copyright material and then is immediately upset when someone is taking money for their work too. I know it's not apples to apples, one being a corporation and one being an individual. I was just unsure on where the line is drawn on this kind of stuff as I don't spend much time in the art communities.