this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
1289 points (97.4% liked)

Political Memes

5230 readers
1418 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Postmortal_Pop@lemmy.world 90 points 6 days ago (4 children)

How do you run out of ballots? Why don't they ship enough for every single legal voter?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 128 points 6 days ago

Step 1: Be opposed to free and fair elections.

Step 2: Determine which districts vote for you less often.

Step 3: Ensure that fewer ballots are delivered to those locations.

It is intentional, not accidental. They probably used low turnout from prior elections (due to voter suppression) as justification for not providing enough ballots for every registered voter.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 70 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They should, at a minimum, have a ballot for every single voter registered to that precinct.

That's what voter registration is for.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 34 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

The problem with the US system seems to be that it's partisan all the way down. It's too easy for the parties standing for election to influence how the election itself is run and counted. This is, I guess, an effect of the USA's highly decentralized approach to elections: if the Republicans run a county, they get to decide how elections work in that county. A more centralized system wouldn't leave the same scope for tweaking each local election to get the desired result in that locality.

[–] Wrench@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago

Republicans also love to volunteer / run for local elections that oversee these logistics purely because they want to manipulate it in bad faith. It's SOP for them.

Hell, they have even been caught multiple times putting up fake ballot areas, and "helping" non-native English speakers fill out their ballots, and being in full control of delivering those ballots.

Both sides are not the same.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A more centralized system is ironically easier to rig too. But we're getting there with decentralization as well.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

The thing about decentralization is that all it changes is who exactly gets to fuck with you by being corrupt.

How centralized or decentralized a system is doesn't matter as much as how accountable people on either end of that spectrum are able to be held.

[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 19 points 5 days ago

Intentional voter suppression.

Benefit-of-a-doubt answer that they aren’t acting maliciously: that would cost way more than necessary for the typical American voter turnout.