this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
467 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59599 readers
3392 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

My father told me he wanted to make USB flash drives of all the scanned and digitized family photos and other assorted letters and mementos. He planned to distribute them to all family members hoping that at least one set would survive. When I explained that they ought to be recipes to new media every N number of years or risk deteriorating or becoming unreadable (like a floppy disk when you have no floppy drive), he was genuinely shocked. He lost interest in the project that he’d thought was so bullet proof.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TechSquidTV@lemmy.world 31 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Im really hoping, waiting, for a good dense long-term storage medium. It doesn't have to be fast, but large, cheap, and durable. I want a way to backup my plex library, or even, daily backups of documents and project files, and I don't want to think about them ever again.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

It does has to be fast enough that you can transfer the files to a different disk within your lifetime.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Tape is cheap and durable if you store it properly. Except the tape drive is expensive af.

Microsoft is working on glass storage. A glass plate can last 10,000 years according to Microsoft. Hopefully that tech will get miniaturized and available to consumers within our lifetimes.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As a former audio engineer in the days where we still used it- tape can rot.

[–] gwen@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

im not an audio engineer, but people didnt know this????

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It seemed like the person I was talking to didn't. The implication was that tape was viable as long-term storage. It isn't. I've seen tapes rot after a year. DATs were especially prone to that, but even things like 2" multitrack audio tape can go bad that quickly.

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Check out Cerabyte its for deep archinval storage

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Punch cards? Stored correctly there's no reason they couldn't last many human lifetimes. But... Yeah it'll take a while to encode everything.

I would have thought that with modern technology we could come up with something like punch cards but more space/time efficient. Physical storage of data - only one write cycle of course, but extremely durable. Even just the same system as punch cards but using tiny, tiny holes very close together on a roll of paper. Could be punched or read by a machine at high speed (compared to a regular punch card, presumably still Ber slow compared to flash media).

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Paper doesn't last centuries. Anyway, punched cards don't have a storage density that's adequate for modern data volumes. You need something that'll durably store nanometre-sized marks.

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Yes that's what I'm thinking, some modernised physical data storage technique.

[–] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

It certainly would make planning the dang home lab easier. Im in a small place! I don't have room for all the stuff i wanna play with!

[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Do optical disks degrade if protected from the elements? A stack of Blu-ray disks could store quite a bit.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The commonly used optical disk technologies degrade over time. CD-RW more rapidly than CDR. It's even worse for higher-density media.

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

And for bigger data sets, the capacity isn't there. And writable media is getting more rare. Probably because of the same reason.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Depends on the disk technologies.

CDs are prone to flaking, otherwise most disk are suspectible of oxidation (disk rot) if stored improperly. M-Disk is a long-life variant of both DVDs and Blu-Rays, although more expensive. However, write-once disks are very ransomware-resilient, and I recommend to add a write-once media to any proper backup setup.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

M-Disk is rated to last like ~~100~~ 1000 years. They are also working on a 125 Terabyte CD. Optical storage is the way to go.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Optical storage

so they've solved bitrot? nice

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Well yeah but BluRay is still much more expensive and smaller capacity. Lets hope this new 125TB disk works out

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

The main cause of bitrot in older disks is the organic dyes fading (aside from REALLY cheap disks where delamination was a problem), whereas M-Disc uses an inorganic carbon material

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was it sapphire or something? But one and done. I wonder if you could just keep writing and just "cross-out" the old stuff with that kind of capacity.

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Not sure what sapphire means, but here is the article. Just appending records and differential backups would seem to be the way to go.

the new optical disks are claimed to be “highly stable so there are no special storage requirements.” The researchers tout an expected shelf life of 50 to 100 years

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Sapphire was one of the materials being researched for optical data storage, once upon a time.

[–] jamyang@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

"Chinese researchers ............"

OK.

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

M-Disc is rated to last 1000 years.

[–] Angry_Autist@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Archive discs are that but not exactly cheap.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago

I think you're looking for stone tablets.