this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
539 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

5405 readers
3234 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be great if the hosts stopped giving him the floor every time he interrupts Harris and the hosts.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I think that's actually beneficial. It allows him to lie again, the moderators to fact check, and then Kamala to respond again. He looks dumb and flustered right now.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It makes him look bad to reasonable people, but it also let's him bluster his way through more and more lies that the brainwashed fox news folk will eat up and consider it him "dominating" over Kamala. Cut the fucking mics ABC, Jesus.

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 37 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Kamala and co purposely allowed open mics because he polled much more poorly when he whines over the open mic constantly

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The issue wasn’t that the mics were open, it’s that his wasn’t open during her responses and she would be cut off from responding to his lunatic interruptions. Still made him look bad, but true open mic debate would’ve been way worse for himz

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

Fair enough, I suppose it's a bit of a line.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Muting him, correcting the lie, and moving on would be far better than letting him interrupt and ramble about immigration for the 1000th time.

[–] ChaoticGoodHeart@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Then the complaint is that he's not given a chance to speak. Facts and reason didn't get us into this mess and they won't get us out either. At this point we have to hope for a McCarthy moment where the spell just collapses. Letting him ramble brings that closer.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Cool, so pander to the weird jackass while shutting down Harris the ONE time she tried to interrupt.

Giving him time to ramble is just giving him time to pander to his base and acting like it is a reasonable thing to do at a debate. Anyone who watched his allotted time had plenty of time to see him ramble, he didn't need EXTRA time.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

Trump has been the wildcard and basically gone against every norm for someone running for office. In 2016 that was more unexpected and the electorate had a clear anti-establishment candidate they could get behind (even though he lost the popular vote).

I think the trick has worn off and we now know how to deal with his antics, plus he's aged and less coherent. Also he was the establishment for 4 years, and can't be the wildcard candidate he once was.

I think Vivek Ramaswamy was trying this playbook during the Republican primaries but failed to account for the cult of Trump and the racism in the party. Maybe it would have worked against someone who wasn't a former president or if Trump was sent to prison sooner.