this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
12 points (92.9% liked)

Hardware

625 readers
220 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile, Broadcom reportedly displeased with 18A wafers

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

yes angstrom. we are st the age of fab nodes where nm isnt precise enough measurmenet under 3nm

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thanks. That's what I thought but guess I couldn't believe we were there. Last I really read (which has been a while), below 3nm, quantum tunneling became a problem. I guess we've addressed that in the fab process.

[–] DScratch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Remember that the reported nm resolution is kinda arbitrary and laced with marketing wank.