this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
121 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54476 readers
470 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In regards to how precedent can fuck over future decisions, could this now cause issues for libraries in the future?

[–] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Unlikely.

The in-house scanning service at the Internet Archive (IA) differs from the licensing agreements entered into by other libraries. These agreements see libraries license ‘official’ e-book versions from publishers, who charge for every book that’s lent out to patrons.

[–] DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

Fair enough. Thanks for the clarity.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

These agreements see libraries license ‘official’ e-book versions from publishers, who charge for every book that’s lent out to patrons.

So it's not "unlikely" that it will fuck over libraries. It's already happened.