this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
786 points (95.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9582 readers
201 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Highway spending increased by 90% in 2021. This is one of many reasons why car traffic is growing faster than population growth.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] copd@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

Why are the cars spaced but the walking humans not?

[–] BlackDragon@slrpnk.net 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Uh, they're not? The cars are in fact much closer to one another than they could possibly be while moving at speed. They would only get this close to one another during a traffic jam. On the other hand, the walkers are entirely capable of moving in exactly the way they are pictured.

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

You haven't seen me walk buddy...

[–] copd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I understand your argument but there is a clear bias here. Unless youre in an exceptionally denly populated area, people dont travel this close to one another. Most leave at least 1-2 humans gap between eachother, especially if there are wheelchairs, kids and prams involved.

Thats all my argument was, the cars are spaced out per lane (albiet bumper to bumper) but the side to side space is not consistent with the walkers. You could fit cars in between the cars with how they are spaced in that pic. I live in a victorian town where the roads force you to drive wingmirror to wingmirror

Im on the fuckcars space here, trust me I agree cars need to be phased out/down but thats no excuse for bias in data

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That and the fact that cars have a much bigger distance radius. So everything can be spaced out more.

15 minute walkable cities are cool. But lets not pretend like you can't drive 2 towns over in 15 minutes by car to reach what you need.

Fuck cars, but that isn't really an argument.

[–] copd@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I completely agree, i live in a city where i can get everything within 15-20min walk. But unfortunately there are about 50-100 people within 25m of my living room at all times and i would rather have some space

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

If you've ever tried to drive a car you'll discover that you need to keep a relatively large distance between other cars, particularly when moving at high speeds in order to avoid crashes.

By contrast, when you're moving through a crowd, you can get practically on top of someone else without risk of bodily harm.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Not me. I wear a Colin Furze style carrot slicer belt at all times. Watch a motherfucker try to ope right by me. Bitch gonna get cut.

[–] Nurgus@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

The cars and walkers are both as close as they can safely be while moving?

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not sure where you drive, but those cars aren't spaced at all- they're very close to bumper-to-bumper, which you can only do at extremely low speeds that unrealistic for travel. Meanwhile, the people that are bundled together ARE actually capable of moving like that, though the average american (who has a larger 'personal bubble' that other cultures) would probably not like it.

Moreover, the car example could actually be worse than it appears- because they're taking up all lanes of a road, so you're assuming they're coming AND going, which none of the other examples are assuming. If you did it properly, the line of cars would be two wide and twice as deep!

[–] copd@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I understand your argument but there is a clear bias here. Unless youre in an exceptionally denly populated area, people dont travel this close to one another. Most leave at least 1-2 humans gap between eachother, especially if there are wheelchairs, kids and prams involved.

Thats all my argument was, the cars are spaced out per lane (albiet bumper to bumper) but the side to side space is not consistent with the walkers. You could fit cars in between the cars with how they are spaced in that pic. I live in a victorian town where the roads force you to drive wingmirror to wingmirror

Im on the fuckcars space here, trust me I agree cars need to be phased out/down but thats no excuse for bias in data

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I understand your argument but there is a clear bias here.

Welcome to fuckcars. Nobody is here to have an honest or productive discussion, this place only exists to let people vent.

[–] copd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah tbh it's a problem of mine, I expect too much from the average user.

thanks for grounding me

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Clearly they are spaced compared to the bus.

[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The people are following this guy.

Alternatively, so they don't get struck by vehicles.

[–] joonazan@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The car/bus comparison is useful, the others aren't because they travel at different speeds.

Probably walking can still move more people than cars. If walking is 5 kph and driving is 50, people need to take 10x less space to break even. They probably do, as cars need to keep distance.

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 months ago

Well, it's still a useful comparison for cities. Good traffic planning brings people into the city center via rail and buses, and then they make sure the city center is walkable.

That way, they can fit the most people into the city center, without it turning into a massive traffic jam.