this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
731 points (97.5% liked)

Gaming

3171 readers
68 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zomg@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

It's a shame, I liked OW1, even with the tired meta and 6v6 more than I liked OW2.

The loot boxes weren't predatory, allowing unlocking of skins and content without spending anything extra was a nice balance in my opinion that I wish more games did.

They took OW1 and bastardized it, it deserves the rating it has. It used to be that new versions of games were better.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

It really is a shame. I played so much OW1, and then suddenly it changed to be like all the other modern games with sleazy monetization that I avoid.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

It used to be that new versions of games were better.

I for one am very interested to see the quality differences between worker owned game studios and corporate studios. But last I heard they had only just started unionizing.

And a programmer friend I talked to couldn’t comprehend why he would want to be in a union.

[–] eyeon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

unions are a harder sell in an industry like tech where it's common to have a diverse skill set spanning work that could arguable each be it's own union. does a full stack dev have to join the database admin union before they can write sql queries?

those diverse skill sets also make the individual value of workers fluctuate a lot more as well.

I still like the idea of unions but I just don't know how you can make them work for tech;if anyone has any good resources on the subject I'd love to read more about it

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 2 months ago

And a programmer friend I talked to couldn’t comprehend why he would want to be in a union.

I also had a programmer friend that was anti-union. He was like "If the place I'm working at sucks, I'll just find another place." Very short sighted and optimistic.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The loot boxes weren't predatory

Ehhh, they were basically the same thing as a slot machine. The battlepass is certainly worse, as it just encourages rampant (not so) microtransactions, but just because the current battlepass system is really predatory, doesn't mean the old loot box system wasn't predatory at all. It was just less predatory.

[–] Zomg@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Well I guess what I mean by that is that loot boxes were free to obtain AND open through leveling and weren't exclusive to forking over money.

No lootboxes at all is the ultimate goal, but I'd take OW1 lootbox style over nearly any others.