this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
90 points (94.1% liked)

Anime

1909 readers
107 users here now

This community is the place to discuss and ask questions about anime, anime news, and related topics.

Currently airing show discussion threads are created by our resident bot, rikka@ani.social. If it doesn't make a thread for an episode that you want to discuss, see the user guide on the wiki for instructions on how to request that rikka make a thread for you to use.

Check out our wiki to find:

Rules

Related General Communities

rikka

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] riskable@programming.dev 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Depends on how old your kids are... Are they old enough to understand suffering and loss? Then it's time to make your kids suffer and lose some of their free time in order to learn something important; like any good parent!

[–] LiteralGrill@ani.social 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You'd rather have kids do it when they're supervised and have love and support then when it is suddenly thrust upon them with no warning, that's for sure.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

No, they should have an older sibling who gives them a copy as a prank and all their friends come over to watch it.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

No, you shouldn't traumatize your KID, so anything below 14, its absolutely ok to show the movie to a young adult or teenager. A kid does understand what suffering is, but doesn't understand the difference between fiction and reality very good.

Thats the same argument as with German fairytales, they aren't made for kids, they are for teenagers and above.

[–] LiteralGrill@ani.social 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ahem... The film is rated...

  • USA: Not rated by the MPAA. Considered "suitable for all audiences" on the Central Park Media VHS release. TV-PG on the Sentai Filmworks release.
  • Germany: 6+ (Apropriate for ages 6 and up.)
  • France: Tous publics (General Audiences)
  • India: U (Unrestricted public exhibition, suitable for all ages.)
  • Hong Kong: Level 1 (Suitable for All Ages.)
  • Canada: G and PG for Quebec and Manitoba respectively.
  • Japan: G
  • Saudi Arabia: PG
  • Singapore: PG
  • Italy: T (Recommended for persons of all age groups.)
  • Taiwan: 0+ (Suitable for all ages)
  • Netherlands: 9 (Ages 9 and up)
  • Nigeria: PG

You'd know that if you read the post! Funnily enough, it also links out to an neat article discussing a study showing parents aren't reading scary stories to their kids... And why that's bad. Here it is just in case ya need it! Heck, on other bits of social media, I heard about schools showing kids the movie in 5th to 6th grade, in the US even!

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just because a rating agency says something doesn't mean its appropriate, they have strict guidelines, these guidelines revolve around obscenitys, violence, drugs and similar, they don't go on "may not be appropriate for children because the story itself is dark and sad" 12+ would be a ok rating in my opinion, again, its not meant for children, German fairytales aren't either, even though they are classified differently.

Kids below a certain age cant even comprehend the story.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

its not meant for children, German fairytales aren't either

Woah there! German fairy tales were meant for children! That's explicitly their target audience.

The whole point was to scare the children into behaving a certain way. Like, "don't go wandering off alone. Bad things can happen!"

If you just tell your kid that they won't listen. However, if you tell them a story about how kids that wandered off alone into a forest got cooked and eaten by a witch then maybe they'll stick to the village (and be wary of strangers).

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social -3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Nope, the Grimm fairytales where explicitly for "adults" so about 16 years old at the time. They have very graphics Sex scenes, brutal murders and more.

Struwwelpeter is aimed towards 8 to 12 year olds as they have a more educational purpose. (wich is probably what you are talking about)

I think they issue is different definitions of kid.

[–] SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You really don't know shit with a passion.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah shure. Maybe just go away when you cant contribute constructively.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Even though it's a fictional, animated depiction of what happened near the end of the WW2 it's depicting something that actually happened. I don't think there's going to be any problems in regards to separating fiction from reality with this movie.

If anything, the movie is tame in comparison to the actual, real-world devastation of nuclear war.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Grave of the Fireflies isn't about the nukes its about the firebombings and the part with fiction vs reality means that they don't understand that this was a long time ago. As said its appropriate for 12+ in my opinion. But below its just not.

[–] literalgrill@sakurajima.moe 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@YourPrivatHater @riskable Over 100,000 WWII vets are still alive, today. People are being bombed right now, shelled right now, having white phosphorus dropped on them, right now.

None of this is a "long time ago." It is within living memory.

[–] YourPrivatHater@ani.social -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And? Are we now shifting the argument onto a strawman over the definition of long time?

It was a average lifetime ago. And the other claims are irrelevant in that context. Its not changing the fact that grave of the Fireflies isn't appropriate for small children.

[–] literalgrill@sakurajima.moe 1 points 2 months ago

@YourPrivatHater Most seem to disagree. Child psychologists disagree. Ratings boards in multiple countries disagree. Kids who have, and continue to watch this movie in Elementary schools growing up healthily is big evidence against it being inappropriate too.

Maybe you're just wrong? Maybe folks shouldn't hide the truths of the world from their kids?

[–] SRo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

A roflcopter parent

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 0 points 2 months ago

My child at age 8 knew exactly what the reality was when her great-grandmother died and saw us all grieving.

She knew exactly what the reality was when, at age 9 and 14 respectively, she saw our cat had to get injected with fluids every day just to live, and our dog had to get euthanized.

She knew exactly what the reality was when in elementary school two kids died in a house fire and she knew them.

I would probably agree that typically only a teenager and above could properly appreciate a movie such as Grave of the Fireflies. And I completely agree children should not be purposefully traumatized, but not all of them have the luxury of being sheltered from traumatizing experiences. Some could handle such a movie and understand what is going on. But to be fair, I have never shown this particular movie to my kid.

[–] LiteralGrill@ani.social 9 points 2 months ago

Read the whole post, give it a serious shake. It cites child psychological studies, shows how kids today are healthily handling stories like these in Japan, and even acknowledges secondary trauma and avoiding triggers for already traumatized people. There's a lot of nuance when you get past the title.