this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
795 points (97.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21410 readers
796 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    To an extent I agree with this, but "Once upon a time, this guy licensed his code under BSD instead of GPL and basically it's his fault the Intel Management Engine exists" is definitely a step too far

    [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Tanenbaum is right, they obviously could've taken the time and money to write an OS themselves if they had to, but they didn't have tobecause a BSD license cuck wrote it for them. Thanks a lot, sucker!

    I have no issues with this point.

    But what’s up with the CIA “a bunch of n****rs” image above that? WTF?

    [–] quantenzitrone@lemmings.world 8 points 2 months ago

    holy fuck i didn't even notice the chin text on that glowing emoji

    WTF

    When i wrote my comment i typed "i know Luke Smith is a bigot" at first, but then toned it down to "controversial" because i haven't really watched or read a lot of him to know for sure. But that image basically confirmed what I thought I knew about him.

    [–] BaumGeist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 months ago

    What the fuck.

    This is your brain on racism.

    [–] tomalley8342@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

    It's in reference to one of the recurring themes that came up in the blogs and streams of Terry A. Davis, sole developer of TempleOS.

    [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 1 points 2 months ago

    I was half hoping for something like that. I like to believe bigots are a lot less common than their loudness would suggest.

    Still terribly problematic and such a niche, ephemeral, reference.

    [–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    I wouldn't either had he stopped there (and perhaps been a shade less overtly hostile to someone giving their work away for free). Instead he followed it up with

    "Maximum amount of freedom to potential users" is somehow mass-surveilance of every computer user thanks to the BSD license. Thanks for your contribution to "freedom."

    [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 2 points 2 months ago

    No problems with that either. Tanembaum did unwittingly contribute to the biggest mass surveillance program ever rolled out worldwide, and all he had to say about it was “they didn’t thank me”. That asshole deserves all the criticism that lands on his feet.