this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
51 points (98.1% liked)

Excellent Reads

1443 readers
3 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Rules:

  1. Common Sense. Civility, etc.
  2. Server rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

While the origins of the “three cueing” method may have been well intentioned I’m guessing lobbying and kickbacks are what’s keeping it in schools, not it’s effectiveness.

There is also the fact that the resistance to classic phonics in the USA developed as an anti-Bush stance during the 2000s. People thought they were taking a progressive stance against his family's conservative ideas about reading by adopting the cueing methods.

Turns out his family's passionate attack against cueing was actually completely justified even by the science of the time, let alone what we know now.

Bush is not a good guy but partisanship has ruined multiple generations of Americans' ability to read, and this cueing bullshit has been leaking into other countries too.

[–] Blaze@reddthat.com 2 points 1 month ago
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Source that it was a result of anti-Bush? This was around way before him.