Progressive Politics

1116 readers

774 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

TokenBoomer@lemmy.world

628

Nice People (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 months ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/progressivepolitics@lemmy.world

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BlitzoTheOisSilent@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And the fact the Soviets practiced a scorched-earth policy as they retreated back to Leningrad, burning their crops fields and such. It prevented the Nazis from eating it, but didn't leave the Soviets much either.

Just horrific all around. Weren't there stories about residents resorting to eating dirt after all the rats had either been killed or fled the city, but before cannibalism?

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

And the fact the Soviets practiced a scorched-earth policy as they retreated back to Leningrad

Scorched earth is more of a metaphor in this context, burning a field in winter is impractical. Rather it meant destroying livestock/infrastructure that couldn't be transported away from enemy lines, rails, power lines, mines, power plants, tractors, etc.

This probably didn't impact the famine inside the city as anything that could be transported into the city or further behind soviet lines was, and anything that couldn't would have been used by the nazis and certainly not given to the people in the city if it wasn't destroyed.

Weren’t there stories about residents resorting to eating dirt

This is common in other famines, it's probably accurate