this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
58 points (95.3% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
381 readers
42 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If they planted that many, only one in ten need to survive
The ecosystem of a mature tree is vastly different to that of a sapling.
Bristol Trees have a very cool calculator that illustrates the impact of replacing mature trees with saplings on CO2 - it takes about 35 years to get back to the same amount of CO2 loss. CO2 isn't the only thing that matters to the environment either, but you'd hope councils were aware of that too
So if they're planting ten trees for every one they cut down, it only takes 3.5 years to break even then?
And after that, they're reducing 9x the amount of Co2?
Oh no sorry, that 35 years was if you're planting 10 trees for every 1 you cut down (have a look at the calculator!)