this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
129 points (96.4% liked)

RetroGaming

19086 readers
424 users here now

Vintage gaming community.

Rules:

  1. Be kind.
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Gen 1 fans of Pokémon, especially those who played Red and Blue versions, can now find a bit more peace regarding the sorrowful character of Cubone. For years, it was known that Cubone never removes its skull helmet due to which nobody has ever seen its real face. However, recent discoveries have proven this notion wrong.

Key Points:

  • Discovery in Picture Book: A 90s coloring book titled Pokémon Picture Diary: Let's Go With Pikachu! by Keiko Fukuyama features a page showing Cubone playing a Pokémon flute without its skull helmet. This indicates that at some point, Cubone was able to take off the skull.
  • Additional Evidence: There are also various products released over the years displaying Cubone’s face when its skull is not on, including a Pokémon card and a plush toy where users can unstitch the skull for it to be revealed.

Do you believe that Pokémon’s creators intentionally included these revelations in their products to subtly provide emotional closure or was it merely coincidental? How do you feel about the revelation of Cubone's face being out there for all to see, given its symbolic representation as a motherless Pokémon?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 31 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

The story behind Cubone never made any sense to me. Maybe I missed something.

But his skull helmet has the whole sad sorry about Mommy attached to it, yadda yadda. Ok, so that story fits for one specimen, or maybe a couple. But is there some massive killing spree on Marrowaks out there that all their mothers die after a single kid? How is this species not extinct?

Their population is cutting in at least half every generation, and for some reason, no offspring are ever seen before their mother perishes, is dead long enough to pry out her skull, and have it somehow fit conveniently as a hat. Or maybe they're pushing down great grandma's skull, I don't know.

But this species never made any sense, because they all have it. If it was just a particular one everything makes sense, but this is some insane shit.

[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

There was a theory going about that they were charmanders, hence the shape of them and the charzard style skull.

[–] wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But don't Chars die if their tail goes out? Or is this some weird cross evolution mechanic now?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

maybe they just die emotionally

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)