this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10163 readers
143 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived version

If reports are true, it would be a violation of the Logan Act.

“The reporting is that former President Trump is on the phone with the Prime Minister of Israel, urging him not to cut a deal right now, because it’s believed that would help the Harris campaign,” said PBS’s Judy Woodruff Monday night. “So, I don’t know where—who knows whether that will come about or not, but I have to think that the Harris campaign would like for President Biden to do what presidents do, and that’s to work on that one.”

Woodruff clarified on Wednesday that the anecdote was not based on her original reporting, but rather on an an Axios story last week that cited two U.S. sources as claiming that Trump and Netanyahu had spoken on the phone about cease-fire and Gaza hostage talks. Netanyahu’s office and Trump both separately denied the report.

“I did encourage him to get this over with. You want to get it over with fast. Have victory, get your victory, and get it over with. It has to stop, the killing has to stop,” Trump said at a New Jersey press conference on Thursday, referring to their meeting at Mar-a-Lago last month. But he also criticized cease-fire demands.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Reagan-Carter election is the first one I vaguely remember as a kid, and to have the news of the freed hostages get announced at the inauguration seemed so convenient even for a politically uninformed kid. Yet I heard so much of "see, he got elected and got them free!" NO, Carter did the work, dumbasses. At the cost of his reelection.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was rumored that the same violation of the Logan act occurred with Reagan

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Rumoured? Iran-Contra was well publicised and accepted as fact.

[–] AckPhttt@beehaw.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What's being discussed for Reagan is the " October Surprise" (not Iran-Contra, a different scandal).

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, my bad,I thought they were linked (in the sense that the weapons from Iran Contra were promised in exchange for the hostages), but I guess they were seperate.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Iran-Contra was about the sale of weapons to Iran during Reagan's second term, not violating the Logan act before his administration.