this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
772 points (93.0% liked)

Political Memes

5203 readers
2687 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SSJMarx@lemm.ee -5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

You neglected to re-repost this critical paragraph.

The U.S. State Department’s Office of the Legal Advisor concluded earlier this year that China’s mass imprisonment and forced labor of ethnic Uighurs in Xinjiang amounts to crimes against humanity—but there was insufficient evidence to prove genocide

and then there's this part

Even the most horrific of crimes...can not be considered genocide unless the perpetrators carry out their crimes “with a very specific intent

In context, this means that the Chinese government has not shown this intent. Which means that they can not be considered to be committing genocide. Which is also what the title of the article says.

Is it ableist of me to tell you that you need some reeducation of your own? Not ideological reeducation - I'm talking about a rehash of middle school reading comprehension, because you somehow keep reading this paragraph that says "the Chinese are not committing genocide" and coming back to me saying "this proves that the Chinese are committing genocide".

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

You:

state dept: this isn’t a genocide (we still think it’s really bad though)

The source, explicitly:

The cautious conclusions of State Department lawyers do not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang

Sorry that English is so difficult for you to parse.

jk, I know you understand, you just find simping for fascism more fun. :)