this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
28 points (61.7% liked)

News

22839 readers
3690 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Notably absent from Walz’s speech was any real substance on foreign policy — including discussion of the genocide happening against Palestinians in Gaza, which uncommitted delegates and their allies have been trying to discuss for days at DNC. Indeed, most of the night, if not the week, has ignored the issue, and where it has been mentioned, Israel’s role in the genocide has been glossed over.

Uncommitted delegates in support of Palestinian liberation and an end to the genocide have requested that the DNC allow a Palestinian speaker take the podium in the United Center, to discuss a permanent ceasefire and an embargo for weapons from the U.S. to Israel, which the U.S. is legally obligated to do.

“We are learning that Israeli hostages’ families will be speaking from the main stage. We strongly support that decision and also strongly hope that we will also be hearing from Palestinians who’ve endured the largest civilian death toll since 1948,” read a statement from the Uncommitted National Movement account on X. "Excluding a Palestinian speaker betrays the party’s commitment in our platform to valuing Israelis and Palestinian lives equally. Vice President Harris must unite this party with a vision that fights for everyone, including Palestinians."

A group of uncommitted delegates, joined by interfaith leaders and their allies, staged a sit-in just outside the convention hall on Wednesday night, saying they wouldn’t remove themselves from that spot until their demands for a Palestinian speaker were met.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (21 children)

Who said change is easy? Those who challenge entrenched interests will always have a difficult road ahead.

But it's not impossible. Civil rights activists achieved change, LGBTQ activists achieved change, even wack-job anti-abortion activists achieved change. So can Gaza activists.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (20 children)

The calculus has changed. Those things happened before concerted propaganda via the internet, which is largely unregulated, unlike television and newspapers. Previously, spreading propaganda was a lot more difficult. The reality is that propaganda is disseminated at high speeds and has tools like Persona Management Software, where half the people you are arguing with online, aren't even real people (just hundreds of sockpuppet accounts controlled by a single person). Was anyone ever able to "flood the zone" with bogus material like this in the past? No, because only the internet allows such endless publishing with no guardrails.

But sure, somehow those are all exactly the same. It's not like LGBTQ rights have been losing ground or anything recently? Give me a break.

We literally have an anti-trans billionaire who owns a fucking media organization, and because he's insulated by money, fuck-all happens to him when he breaks the law.

EDIT: Further, we're literally headlong into a "death of truth" era because of AI video. The idea that the speed at which propaganda can be made and disseminated doesn't change how hard it is to fight is abso-fucking-lutely bullshit. This is a way harder fight, and comparing to past fights is a fucking joke.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (19 children)

All activists will sometimes lose ground. The successful ones gain the ground back. The unsuccessful ones are discouraged by setbacks, complain about the latest tactics used by their opponents, and give up.

Women's rights activists suffered a huge setback in 2022. They did more than complain about the internet and billionaires. They redoubled their efforts and are determined to gain all that ground back in the coming years. And then some.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oh no! Someone complained! That must mean they're not a real activist who gets anything done and thus should be chided and dismissed!

If that's really your implication here, get fucked, cunt. People can and do both. You're allowed to speak at how fucked the situation is while also trying to do something about it, and people telling us "just try harder" like they're doing anything better can eat dogshit.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You can, and should, do whatever activism you can.

Who cares about how hard it is with Persona Management blah blah blah. Activism isn't supposed to be easy. Get it done, or don't.

Every other Democratic activist in America faces the exact same problems, but they aren't whining. Women's rights activists got ballot initiatives in ten states this year. They rose to the challenge, and that's why they are successful.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)