this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
505 points (96.5% liked)

Lefty Memes

4099 readers
93 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, upvoting good contributions and downvoting those of low-quality!

Rules

0. Only post socialist memes

That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)

1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here

Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.

2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such,

as well as condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.

3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.

That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).

4. No Bigotry.

The only dangerous minority is the rich.

5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)

6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.

Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.

7. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

(This is not a definitive list, the spirit of the other rules still counts! Eventual duplicates with other rules are for emphasis.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I disagree.

Well, you're wrong.

You believe there have been "a ton" of human societies with no exploitation? You have no idea what you're talking about.

There have been a ton of societies which limited the amount of power individuals could amass.

Oh I see! Distinct differences! LOL

Yeah. Feudal property relations are totally the same as capitalistic property relations. No difference whatsoever. Pretty much everyone is still a subsistence farmer. /s

[–] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, you're wrong.

LOL

limited

Ah! So now you're changing your tune! Not "preventing" but "limiting". Best of luck, maybe you'll get to reality in the end.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So, amassing of power can't be limited in your opinion?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Because that's what you're implying.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm neither saying nor implying that.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yes you are:

"We" cannot stop human beings from gaining power over others so the question is moot.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I see where the confusion lies. Let me rephrase:

"We" cannot prevent power or exploitation so the question is moot.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one's talking about power itself, but of its' monopolisation.

Why can't that and exploitation be prevented via social structures? Why are you ignoring all the precedents where it was/is already prevented?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No one's talking about power itself, but of its' monopolisation.

You're not making any sense. We're not communicating. Take care.

[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Got it, you're refusing to engage.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So you admit it's personal rather than topical, cool.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 1 points 3 weeks ago